Half-truths against SIOE – make your own mind up

People, and especially Jews please read this and then come to the demonstration. 

Ask yourselves who is deceiving you? The most dangerous lie is a half-truth and the CST’s articles about SIOE are full of half-truths.

SIOE has never made a secret of its hardline views on Islam and Muslims. SIOE considers that the talk about “moderate”, “political”, “radical” and “extreme” Islam is long passed.  SIOE blames so-called “moderate” Muslims for the problems the non-Islamic world is now facing and has been arguing for a “gloves-off” debate about the place, if any, of Islam within democracy without success. SIOE agrees with the vast majority of Muslim clerics in Islamic countries that Islam and democracy are mutually exclusive.

Our ruling politicians and violent self-styled “anti-fascist” activists have quashed all debate about Islam and we are now suffering the consequences. Our arguments may be seen on our site and we leave people to decide – after they have done the research. We say this because the Western media, certain groups and especially politicians lie about the threat of Islam or at the very least censor what is going on.

The media are obsessed with the Israel v Palestine conflict at the exclusion of all else. It was with this backdrop of censorship that SIOE sent out a genuine request for Jews to attend the demonstration against further mosque building until the preaching of jihad is stopped in existing mosques, scheduled for 13th December in front of Harrow’s Civic Centre at 14.00.

This lead to an interesting interchange between SIOE and an organisation called  the CST and the sequence of events is more or less recapped below.

Please read all of the information including the links and then form your own opinion.

1. 01/10/2009 – The press release for the demonstration was sent to national and international media outlets, anti-Islamist blogs and sites for Jewish, Coptic, Hindu, Sikh and Christian communities among others.

2. 26/11/2009 A press release was sent to Jewish media outlets, anti-Islamist blogs and Jewish blogs asking for Jews to bring 1,000 Israeli flags and to defend Israel’s right to exist and to protest against the biased media coverage Israel receives, as well as to protest against jihad against Jews that is preached in mosques across the world.

3. 30/11/2009 The CST published this response to the press relase calling for Jews to attend. This was reproduced in the Jewish Chronicle.

4. SIOE sent this response to the CST

This email is copied to several Jewish outlets and individuals.

Regarding this article in the Jewish Chronicle. http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/22478/cst-warns-jews-against-joining-anti-muslim-demo

For your information, I have stood several times in elections against the BNP and what they stand for.

Equating synagogues to mosques is reprehensible in my view. When terrorists leave synagogues to blow up planes and tube trains then we at SIOE might reconsider our position.

Until that happens we will continue to support Israel and the right of Jews to exist and to defend themselves.

The whole world has a problem with terrorists who bellow “Allah u akbar” when they kill, not just the West. This is a problem for Muslims to solve, which they have signally failed to do. Until they do actually solve their problems with their so-called religion, then we reserve the right to demonstrate against further mosque building in the West and the foisting of Islamic practices upon non-Muslims.

Minorities are persecuted in Islamic countries, by Muslims. No moderate Muslims come to their aid. Not far from Israel, Copts are oppressed in a near genocidal fashion, by Muslims in Egypt. No moderate Muslim speaks up for the Copts in any mosque in Egypt or England. No moderate Muslim speaks up for Copts in Europe. The only non-Coptic group who speaks up for Copts is SIOE. Not even the Chief Rabbi speaks up for Copts, to my knowledge. So to be likened to the BNP is damned well insulting.

We in SIOE oppose communism, Nazism and above all Islam, recognising them all to be different manifestations of the same thing, namely, totalitarianism. Islam is the nastiest form of totalitarianism and anybody who denies this is a fool wilfully blind to events. Durban II ring a bell anybody?

Arguably, it was Western colonisation that halted Islam and its persecution of non-Muslims. It was certainly the West that forced the Ottoman Empire to stop imposing the jizzya tax on non-Muslims. Since that colonisation ceased the persecution has resumed. This is in no way intended as a defence of imperialism, but the behaviour of Muslims towards non-Muslims before the rise of the West was reprehensible, ask the Serbs. The behaviour of Muslims towards non-Muslims is reprehensible now. Ask Copts in Egypt, Christians in Pakistan, Sudan and Indonesia, Hindus in Bangladesh and Malaysia amd Jews everywhere.

In Denmark, Muslims have created non-Muslim no-go zones and are charging them the jizzya tax in order to move and go about their business. News of this is suppressed by media outlets which is obsessed with Israeli actions against Muslims (not the reverse).

Honing down any opposition to Islam, and therefore Muslims because Islam requires its practitioners to function, to merely being the BNP, is dangerous. The BNP has gained seats in the European Parliament, not because of SIOE, but because of the real Islamophobes in the British Parliament, who kowtow down to the Muslim demands backed up by threats of violence. It has also gained these seats because ordinary people have had their legitimate concerns quelled by insults and accusations of racism, xenophobia and bigotry. In other words people are feeling “I’m damned if I do and I’m damned if I don’t, so I may as well”.

The only recourse left for opponents of Islamisation in Europe is the streets because the dialogue now called for by “moderate” Muslims has, until now, been denied non-Muslim opponents of Islam.  So-called moderate Muslims will not come to the aid of Jews, homosexuals or the Kuffar, should Islam4UK get its way and Islam with its horrible sharia law becomes the ruling despotism in the UK and Europe. Where have they prevented persecution of non-Muslims in Islamic countries or the rise of such persecution?

P.S.

I forgot to mention the image in the article was published without the caption.

It is here http://sioe.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/harrow-stop-mosque-buiding-demo-13th-december/

and the caption puts it in context, reproduced below.

The Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan, publicly read an Islamic poem including the lines: “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and Muslims our soldiers…”

Why are the media so enamoured of truth-economy that borders on Kitman?

 4. 03/12/2009 SIOE phoned the CST asking if were going to publish the reply and was told that the CST would definitely not be doing so. I said that the CST could write a disclaimer and that it did not alter its position regarding SIOE, but this was refused.

An hour long conversation ensued in which SIOE accused the CST or being a deceitful organisation that wilfully misled its readers. We think this accusation has some merit.

The discussion included:-

a) Moderate Muslims – the CST accused SIOE of driving Muslims to become extreme, and SIOE suggested that quashing of debate about Islam was causing people to vote for parties the media describe as far-right.

SIOE said that moderate Muslims had had plenty of time to stop jihadism in mosques and had failed to do so. For example, in the days surrounding SIOE’s 11th September Harrow demonstration three Muslims were convicted for planned terrorist attacks who had been taught jihad in Walthamstow mosque, which itself had reportedly been “radicalised” for 20 years. Under such circumstances SIOE’s protests in Harrow were justified, a fact reinforced by the arrest of Muslims in Manchester on terrorist charges.

b) SIOE pointed out that the CST had deceitfully omitted the caption to the mosque-cartoon which was lines taken from an Islamic poem quoted by Recep Erdogan, the Prime Minister of Turkey.

SIOE pointed out that moderate Muslims had voted Erdogan into power AFTER his release. The CST guy whimpered not everybody in Turkey voted for him (I guess everybody in the USA voted for Bush then everybody voted for Obama?), to which I retorted that similar Islamic governments are being voted into power where any semblance of democracy exists in Muslim countries, such as Malaysia. I explained this is why we don’t believe in moderate Muslims, for which we receive both criticism and support. Generally people support our notion when we explain why, which is exactly why the CST refuses to publish our reply and doctors conversations in the way it has.

c) SIOE complained that it was totally wrong to link SIOE with any political party as political parties are banned from its demonstrations. The subjects in SIOE’s reply were discussed and CST’s assertions thorougly rebuffed.

d) The question of racism was raised and once again SIOE correctly stated that Muslims comprise many races and kill non-Muslims of all races, especially Jews which have virtually been eradicated in countries like Afghanistan.  Race is not an issue, but hatred for the Kuffar and especially Jews is.

This was along conversation that I wished I had recorded. Anyway, I managed to persuade the CST that at least it should publish the caption for the cartoon as it had been so scathing in its attack on the image and made gross extrapolations as to what would happen.

5) 04/12/2009 The CST published this response to the telephone conversation

a) Note the point about Muslims voting Erdogan into power after his release was not included

b) The reference to people spitting at veiled women is actually contemptible when one considers the rise in acid attacks on Muslim women, not only in Muslim countries, but also in Europe and the UK, as can be seen in these graphic pictures of facial disfigurement.

Let’s look at this one issue of burkhas and face veils. One argument levelled at SIOE is that we make it difficult for moderate Muslims. It is well known that women are fighting the introduction of the veil in Turkey (where it and the burkha are still banned in public) and also its imposition in Iran, among other places.

SIOE argues that the allowing of the veil and the burkha in the West makes it impossible for women to oppose them in Muslim countries. The male Muslim clerics can point to the West and say “They wear them in Kuffar countries so you can damned well wear them here”.

BAN THE BURKHA AND BAN THE VEIL!

“The nastiest bigots are those prejudiced against their own people” and this is seemingly true of the CST in our honest opinion. Why else would it publish its opinion based on deceit?

SIOE never asked the CST to change its opinion about us or to support us, only to print our reply and to let its readership decide. Fat chance from truth-manipulating self-loathing bigots.

SIOE’s actions do not garner support for the BNP it is organisations like the CST with its censorship and the UAF which brands everybody with whom it disagrees, a fascist.

When people have a free and fair choice they vote against Islamisation, as they did recently in Switzerland.

Labour will demonstrate against Harrow mosque protest in December

“Come along!”       “Clear off!”

Councillors Shah and Hall

SIOE does not believe any UAF key signatories will join a couple of Labour councillor’s siding with a few UAF thugs opposing SIOE’s “Stop Islamisation” demonstration and prayers for the victims of Muslim persecution.

UAF key signatories are intelligent enough to see that SIOE campaigns against the oppression of minority communities and, therefore, would not want to stop SIOE’s protest against the hate-speech that is spouted in mosques against the Kuffar by the Ummah. This is especially so as all of these key signatories are guilty by association of anti-Semiticism in SIOE’s considered opinion.

SIOE believes UAF key signatories will not be supporting the counter-protest because they no longer wish to be associated with the inevitable gratuitous violence of the UAF.

Councillor Navin Shah absurdly said “he would support anybody showing solidarity with any faith group challenged by SIOE, as long as they did it peacefully.”

The clue is in the name Councillor Shah “Stop ISLAMISATION of Europe”. 

So, Councillor Shah will be standing with Muslims and UAF from outside of Harrow against SIOE’s legal protest in flagrant contradiction to the expressed wishes of Harrow mosque’s leaders and fellow councillor Susan Hall.

SIOE reminds councillor Shah that the reason a second protest has been organised in Harrow is because the first one on 11th September was prevented from happening by Muslims descending upon Harrow and behaving violently, goaded by a few UAF thugs.  We were therefore once again  compelled to assert our democratic right to protest.

SIOE is confident that this will not happen again and a subsequent protest will not have to be planned because Harrow mosque leaders and councillors have asked Muslims from outside of Harrow to stay away.  This time we believe Muslims will heed the requests of their leaders, just as Muslims have previously heeded calls for jihad preached in mosques.  Muslims will wish to atone for past misdeeds and will want to reverse the “radicalisation” of mosques. Consequently, they will stay away. This change of heart has no doubt been instilled by SIOE’s protests and the frequent protests of others (the calender for which may be seen at the top of SIOE’s website).

However, typically, UAF is trying to whip up violence in its Hitler Brownshirts fashion.  SIOE suggests that, as they have no intention of counter-protesting against SIOE (the most anti-fascist organisation in Europe), UAF key signatories immediately dissociate themselves from this troublemaking and woefully misnamed organisation, “United Against Fascism”.

Harrow Times Friday 4th December 2009

By Jack Royston »

LABOUR politicians opposing an anti-mosque rally will demonstrate alongside anti-fascist campaigners.

Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE) says Islamaphobia is the “height of common sense” and plans to hold a protest outside Harrow Central Mosque, in Station Road, on December 13. The religious institution has appealed for its own supporters to stay away but Unite Against Fascism (UAF) has vowed to hold a counter-demonstration.

Councillor Navin Shah, London Assembly member for Brent and Harrow, said it was inevitable that an opposition protest will take place, and he and other Labour politicians will turn out to back the mosque. He said he would support anybody showing solidarity with any faith group challenged by SIOE, as long as they did it peacefully.

He said: “As a Labour party elected member I will be there. I will therefore be demonstrating – it can only be described as that – but I will not be supporting any form of violence or act of anti-social behaviour.”

Councillor Bill Stephenson, leader of the Labour Group on Harrow Council, said he would also be out on the street to show his support. The two politicians were among a delegation that met Commander Bob Broadhurst, in charge of public order policing at the Met, to discuss the strategy for the day. They said the discussion was reassuring. The protest will be at 2pm, in Station Road, opposite the mosque.

SIOE held another demonstration on September 11, when violent scenes marred efforts to present a united front.

Calling all Christians to pray for Muslims in Harrow

CHRISTIANS PLEASE COME TO HARROW TO PRAY FOR FORGIVENESS OF MUSLIMS WHO PERSECUTE CHRISTIANS IN ISLAMIC COUNTRIES

Please come to the demonstration in front of Harrow’s Civic Centre on 13^th December at 14.00 to pray for Christians persecuted in Islamic countries merely for being Christians and for the forgiveness of Muslims perpetrating the persecution

An area will be set aside for prayers to be held and time allotted for this

Christian speakers are welcome to describe the persecution being carried out against Christians in Muslim countries such as Pakistan, Indonesia, Sudan, Somalia, Iraq, Egypt, Iran, Nigeria, etc etc etc

 

Why is none of these men a Muslim?

The answer each man gives is guaranteed to incense Muslims.

In fact, the mere presence of Christians in Muslim countries appears to incense Muslims.

This leads to persecution of Christian minorities.

Serious persecution of Christians in Islamic countries - video

Christians persecuted in Iraq – video

Malaysia: Muslim Persecution of Christians – video

Pakistan: Christians terrorized by Muslims – video

Help Iran’s persecuted Christians – video

Christians in Somalia – video

Christian Persecution in Nigeria -video

Persecuted Christians – Sudan – video

It is true that Christians are persecuted in other countries, but Islamic countries more often than not are top of the list  for persecuting Christians

It is sad, but true, that oppression of Christians is taught in the mosques in Islamic countries.

Extreme Christians are those who are fed to lions or crucified while forgiving those feeding them to lions or crucifying them.

For one reason or another there are few extreme Christians. They are either dead or fail to live up to the ultimate sacrifice for their faith.

Nevertheless, Christians are suffering in Muslim countries and Christians fortunate enough to live in Western democracies may show their concern by praying for those doing the persecuting and their victims.

It doesn’t matter what others may say, follow your Christian conscience and pray for their salvation.

Anti-Israel and therefore anti-Semitic by association

PRESS RELEASE

TO ISRAEL AND JEWS – HOW MANY MORE ENEMIES DO YOU NEED?

To reiterate an earlier statement: SIOE is separate to the English Defence League, Casuals United and other anti-Islamist groups in England

The 13th September “Stop further mosque building” demonstration in Harrow is organised by SIOE. It has been falsely reported that other groups have organised this demonstration. 

Efforts are made constantly to link SIOE with the BNP and SIOE is constantly branded as a fascist organisation by some blogs and internet contributors. 

SIOE’s opponents constantly use “guilt by association” as a means of linking SIOE with racist organisations. 

However, its previous actions have shown that SIOE is the most anti-fascist organisation in Europe and serious and knowledgeable anti-fascist groups no longer oppose SIOE’s demonstrations.

SIOE has persistently stood up for and spoken about minority groups persecuted by Muslim majorities, for example Copts, which other self-styled anti-fascist groups have neglected. 

SIOE always has, and always will, unswervingly condemn racism. 

SIOE supports Israel’s existence and the right of Jewish people to defend themselves.  Palestinian and Muslim groups have declared that every Jew is a legitimate target for jihad (that is murder)regardless of where he/she may live. 

However, SIOE’s opponents have recently declared their opposition to Israel and therefore Jews. 

Israel: Scottish fans urged to wave Palestinian flags at match

SIOE regards this alleged appeal by Scottish TUC spokesperson, David Moxham, to border on anti-Semiticism because Israel has once again been singled out for censure, while nearby Egypt is once again ignored for its genocidal acts against the Copts, for example.

The motive for this selective condemnation might rightly be regarded as being because  Jews comprise the majority in Israel. 

Our opponents constantly condemn SIOE for not recognizing the difference between Muslim moderates and extremists.  Muslim moderates are not protecting Copts in Egypt or Hindus in Malaysia.  Muslim moderates are not protecting Jews in Muslim countries.  Muslim moderates voted into power Recep Erdogan, the Prime Minister of Turkey, after he’d been imprisoned for reading the Islamic poem about minarets being bayonets, that inspired SIOE’s cartoon advertising its “Stop Islamisation” demonstration in Harrow on 13^th December. 

By wilfully ignoring such persecution while simultaneously focusing on Israel is anti-Semitic in SIOE’s considered opinion.

David Moxham is a co-signatory with the UAF and other organisations as well as individuals to this declaration

Therefore, SIOE considers all of these co-signatories to be guilty by association with David Moxham of being selectively anti-Israel and thereby of being selectively anti-Semitic because of David Moxham’s alleged statement.

Guilt by association works in both directions.  Therefore, any opposition to anti-Semiticism made by the UAF and its associates is now not to be taken seriously, by UAF’s own rules.

SIOE welcomes David Moxham and any of his co-signatories to refute SIOE’s assertions and will gladly publish any non-abusive statements to the contrary on its website.

In fact we eagerly await any condemnation of any Muslim atrocities perpetrated anywhere. This right to reply is denied SIOE, most recently (today) by the CST.

To Swiss nationals in London – Aux citoyens suisses vivant à Londres

UN GRAND MERCI AU BON PEUPLE DE SUISSE QUI A VOTE CONTRE LES MINARETS

 

Aux citoyens suisses vivant à Londres

Si vous n’avez pas pu voter au referendum en Suisse ,mais que vous voudriez marquer votre opposition à la construction d’autres mosquées ainsi qu’à des minarets déjà existants, alors s’il vous plait ,venez à la manifestation du SIOE à harrow le 13décembre  et apportez des drapeaux suisses avec vous

Même si vous n’avez pas voté, s’il vous plait, venez à la manifestation et rejoignez le nombre croissant de gens qui veulent  défendre  l’Europe et la démocratie et se défendre contre l’islam avec sa sharia qui est une loi rétrograde

Le résultat du reférendumen Suisse a été un vote sain et un vote pour les valeurs Européeennes

Neammoins les insensés  des nations unies  ont qualifié cette décision de « discriminatoire »

Les nations unies sont clairement influencés par 57pays musulmans qui forment le plus grand bloc de votes.

La société des minoritésen Suisse a utilement créé un jeu »nommez le drapeau » qui place le drapeau suisse parmi les pays islamiques qui bannissent les religions autres que l’islam

La société a suggéré que la Suisse ne devienne pas aussi intolérante que l’Arabie saoudite .Bien sûr ,la suisse ne doit pas devenir un pays islamique ,et n’a pas banni .

la construction  les mosquées, .seulement les minarets

L’arabie saoudite proscrit toutes les autres religions

Permettant seulement l’islam,et interdit de construire des églises ,des temples ou des synagogues.

Pas du tout comme en Suisse

Le bon sens a prévalu en Suisse,et les suisses ont décidé que la Suisse devrait devenir un peu moins intolérantes que  l’arabie saoudite

Deutsch

Ein grosses Dankeschön an alle Schweizer, die für das Minarettverbot gestimmt haben!

Sehr geehrte in London lebende Schweizer, falls Sie keine Gelegenheit hatten beim Schweizer Referendum mitzumachen, können Sie bei einer anderen Gelegenheit Ihrem Standpunkt gegen Moscheenbau und Minarette Ausdruck verleihen, und zwar mit Ihrer Teilnahme an der SIOE Demonstration in Harrow am 13. Dezember. Bringen Sie Ihre Schweizer Fahnen mit!

Auch wenn Sie sich am Referendum beteilt haben, gesellen Sie sich bitte auch zur stetig wachsenden Gruppe der Menschen, die für Europa und Demokratie einstehen und sich mutig (und politisch uncorrect) gegen den Islam und die Sharia aussprechen.

Das Ergebnis des Referendums in der Schweiz war Sieg des gesunden Menschenverstandes und europäischen Werten basierend auf den Menschenrechten.

Nichtsdestotrotz, wird diese Wahl von den Vereinten Nationen angezweifelt und als diskriminierend abgeurteilt. Die Vereinten Nationen sind eindeutig von den 57 islamischen Staaten, welche ihren grössten Wählerblock ausmachen, beeinflusst und ideologisch infiltriert.

Die pro-islamische “Gesellschaft der Minderheiten” setzte in einem Plakat demonstrativ die Schweizer Fahne neben Fahnen wie Saudi Arabien und Sudan mit der Überschrift “Staaten mit eingeschränkter Religionsfreiheit”, um zu demonstrieren, dass die Schweiz in ihrem Minarettvervot sich der religiösen Intoleranz dieser Ländern annähert.

Dass sich die Schweiz mit dieser Wahl versucht, sich der imperialistischen, faschistischen Ideologie, die diese Länder knechtet, zu entziehen, scheint die “Gesellschaft der Minderheiten” dabei zu übersehen und disqualifiziert sich durch diesen Irrsinn selber.

Saudi Arabien verbietet alle anderen Religionen ausser dem Islam und verhindert den Bau von Kirchen, Tempeln und Synagogen.

Der gesunde Menschenverstand hat sich in der Schweiz durchgesetzt und die Schweizer setzen sich dafür ein, dass Ihr Land sich nicht Saudi Arabien annähert.

English version 

 A BIG THANKYOU TO THE GOOD PEOPLE OF SWITZERLAND WHO VOTED AGAINST MINARETS

To Swiss nationals living in London

If you were unable to vote in the referendum in Switzerland, but would like to make your opposition to further mosque building and minarets, then please come to the SIOE demonstration in Harrow on 13th December and bring Swiss flags with you.

Even if you did vote, please come along to the demonstration and join the growing number of people willing to stand up for Europe and democracy and to stand against Islam with its inferior sharia law.

The result of the referendum in Switzerland was a vote for sanity and a vote for European values

However, the insane United Nations reported that the decision was clearly discriminatory

The UN is clearly influenced by the 57 Islamic countries that form the largest voting bloc.

Helpfully, the Society of Minorities in Switzerland produced a game of “name the flag” which placed Switzerland’s among those Islamic countries that outlaw religions other than Islam.

The society suggested that Switzerland should not become as intolerant as countries like Saudi Arabia. Of course Switzerland must not become an Islamic country and has not banned mosque building, only minarets.  Saudi Arabia prohibits all other religions, allowing only Islam.

Common sense prevailed in Switzerland and the Swiss people decided that Switzerland should become less like Saudi Arabia.

High level meeting over anti-mosque demo in Harrow

High level meeting over anti-mosque demo in Harrow  

Councillor Susan Hall, quote:  “Harrow is an area where communities have always enjoyed good relations, but once again we face the prospect of our streets being used as some kind of mutual staging post by those with extreme views. 

 “This borough has no truck with those who come here to cause violence, or those who misuse the name of Islam and visit with a violent agenda of their own.

As it was Muslims who committed ALL of the violence on 11th September (after the demo) why did Harrow council give planning permission for the architectural carbuncle dumped on Station Road to be used as a staging post for jihadists in the first place? 

Obviously the 7/7 London bombings, Finsbury Park mosque, Birmingham’s Green Lane mosque, Regent’s Park mosque, Derby’s Ahl-e-Hadith mosque and Walthamstow mosque, to name but a few, were insufficient in threat to dissuade Harrow Council to refuse planning permission for another potential jihadist hang-out. 

All of the mosques named above should have been closed down and Harrow mosque should never have been built.

Sarah Cox, of the Brent and Harrow branch of UAF, quote: “by attacking the mosque they are attacking the whole concept of a multi-cultural society.”

Attacking?  That is undisguised inflammatory language typical of a fascisto-communist organisation like UAF.

Predictably, it is also entirely inaccurate.  SIOE invites all non-Muslim cultures, except Nazis, fascists, communists and political parties to participate in its events.  Therefore, SIOE is a multi-cultural organisation opposing the imposition of mono-cultural Islam.

In line with all of its previous events SIOE invites all non-Muslim cultures, except Nazis, fascists (including UAF) communists and political parties to participate in its Harrow demonstration against further mosque building on 13^th December.

SIOE is considering applying for EU funding for its future multi-cultural activities. By opposing SIOE, the most anti-fascist organisation in Europe, UAF is merely exposing it is not serious about anti-fascism, but only in stirring up unrest and opposing people’s right to legally protest against fascistic  jihadism being preached in mosques.

Sarah Cox would be better employed taking a plane to Somalia to protest against women being stoned to death by Muslims in the name of Allah.

Here’s a reminder of what was and still is being taught in mosques in England, Europe and the rest of the world that Harrow mosque leaders did nothing to stop.

Undercover mosque video

Ghulam Rabbani, general secretary of the mosque, said:  “We have the fullest confidence in the police to safeguard the mosque.”

SIOE has the fullest confidence that the London Metropolitan Police will make the correct decisions and safeguard protestors at the SIOE demonstration and will not favour Muslims either within the mosque or without it, unlike the West Midlands Police who got it woefully wrong in the “Undercover mosque” case as can be seen in the video below.

English Law not sharia law

UK Muslims make case for Sharia law

Masjid & Madrasah al Tawhid mosque in Leyton, east London, where thousands of Sharia cases have been dealt with over the past 27 years.

ENGLISH LAW NOT SHARIA LAW

Harrow residents and other English citizens who wish to stop Sharia law please bring banners to the SIOE demo on 13th December saying “English law not Sharia law”

Harrow mosque leaders have assured Harrow that no Sharia courts will be held in the new Harrow mosque.

Why should people believe them?  What constitutes a Sharia court anyway?  It would be reasonable to assume that every mosque has carried out some Sharia arbitrations, such as how a Muslim man may beat up his wife and when (even if they are not legally man and wife under English Law) according to Sharia law.

Large numbers of British mosques are not properly registered with the Charity Commission and conduct Muslim marriages that are unrecognised under English Law.

Was the old Harrow mosque registered?  Is the new Harrow mosque registered?  One would hope that such a huge unmissable eyesore is registered. 

Colin Randall, Foreign Correspondent

LONDON// Flanked by Islamic bookshops in one of the shabbier corners of London, the modest facade of the Masjid Tawhid bears no resemblance to the solemn grandeur of the Royal Courts of Justice in the centre of the capital.

But tucked away inside a building that also offers ample accommodation for prayers, classes and social functions is a tiny room where justice is dispensed with no less seriousness than in the official courts.

Here in Leyton High Road, in London’s East End, and in nearby premises previously used by the Islamic Sharia Council of the UK, some 10,000 cases have been dealt with during the past 27 years. The workload is increasing and senior Muslim scholars who administer the system believe it is only a matter of time before Sharia is formally accepted within the framework of British law.

But this growth has generated fierce criticism in some quarters. A report by the think-tank Civitas earlier this year claimed 85 Sharia courts were operating in the UK, sometimes giving the Muslims who turn to them illegal advice on matrimonial and divorce issues. Its allegations are firmly challenged by the council, but Britain’s Conservative opposition is expected to impose restrictions if it takes power next year.

For Sheikh Haitham al Haddad, one of the council’s most senior members, the work of such tribunals can be “complementary to the civil courts” and in certain cases find solutions that would be beyond the established legal system.

He suspects the hostility of some non-Muslims is based on confusion with such punishments as the stoning of adulteresses, amputation of thieves’ hands and flogging for drinking alcohol. British public concern has been heightened by demonstrations in which militants have demanded the full application of Sharia.

As a devout Muslim, Sheikh Haddad, born in Saudi Arabia to Palestinian parents, considers physical punishment consistent with Islamic teaching, but points out that this is a philosophical issue that has nothing to with the council, which deals purely with civil disputes.

“We are not asking for the flogging of people for drinking or stoning for adultery,” he said. “These things simply have no place in our discussions.”

Some 85 per cent of the cases heard in Leyton, he said, concerned the dissolution of marriages and divorce arrangements. Inheritance matters and the declaration of fatwas on a range of matters covering Muslims’ working and domestic lives accounted for most of the remainder.

Appel til alle danskere / Call to all danes

Appel til alle danskere der lever i London eller alle danskere der har mulighed for at være i London d. 13. dec.

Call to all danes who live in London or have the possibility to be present in London dec. 13th.

D. 13. dec. kl 14. afholder Stop Islamisation Of Europe en demonstration udeforan den nye stor-moské i Harrow. / Join Stop Islamisation Of Europe (SIOE) Dec. 13th at 1400 hours in a demonstration against the big mosque in Harrow.

Vi afholder demonstrationen fordi vi sidste gang ikke fik lov til at gennemføre den anmeldte demonstration p.gra. muslimer der ikke havde forstået demokratiets spilleregler. Politiet måtte derfor tilsidst afbryde demonstrationen.

Vi vil blive ved med at afholde denne demonstration indtil vi kan sige vi har afholdt demonstration mod Harrow stor-moskéen i fred og ro. Det har vi fortalt politiet og de har lovet at sikre demonstrationen på bedste måde hvilket vi har fuld tillid til.

For øjeblikket bliver der planlagt stor-moskéer flere steder i Danmark og hvis vi vil have støtte til kampen mod disse, er vi også nødt til at støtte kampen mod stor-moskéer andre steder i Europa. Husk på at ordren til at bekæmpe Danmark udsprang fra moskéerne og blev spredt herfra. Herfra gik ordren på at brænde danske flag og danske ambassader af.

Derfor mød op i Harrow med godt humør og masser af danske flag så vi kan vise dem at vi ikke er blevet kuet og at det danske flag ikke bare er det ældste i verden men også det smukkeste!

Anders Gravers

Harrow residents who object to the mosque

All non-Muslim residents who object to the massive mosque blighting Station Road please voice your objections at the SIOE demonstration in front of the Civic Centre on 13th December at 14.00.

If Harrow residents protesting against the mosque receive any kind of intimidation after the demonstration, then please inform SIOE and the police immediately. We still live in a moderately free country, despite the efforts of the government Tony McNulty was once a minister of state within. We are still free to voice our objections, at least free from intimidation for doing so (please whisper that snippet of information to Muslims and UAF henchmen).

We know that objections were made by Harrow Council Tax payers against early opening hours for the mosque, but as usual objections were ridden roughshod over by an arrogant council.

It is only to be regretted that SIOE never organised a demonstration against this dominating edifice of theocratic oppression at the planning stages. It would certainly never have been built.

Reportedly, objections were indeed raised against the mosque at the planning stages, but to no avail.

However, Harrow mosque is now a perfect symbol for opposition to further mosque-building until violent jihad and hatred for the Kuffar is stopped being preached in existing mosques.

Local councils are now taking note of Council Tax payers’ objections with two mosques being refused planning permission, one in Lincoln and the other in Lichfield. 

Unfortunately, Judge Mr Justice Wyn Williams granted outline planning permission to Dudley Muslim Association’s plans to build a mosque. So SIOE will now have to pay a visit to Dudley to endeavour to prevent its despoiling.

So, if you are a Harrow resident who is fed up with having this mosque dumped on your doorstep and don’t want to hear “Allah u akbar” blasting out of loudspeakers at the top of an unnecessary 120 foot high minaret, then please come to the demonstration and get your voice heard for once.

There may be no plans for loudspeakers on the minaret. Let’s keep it that way by saying so at the demo.

Please bring banners saying “I didn’t want the mosque”.

Jews please come to the Harrow demo

BRING ONE THOUSAND ISRAELI FLAGS

SIOE supports Israel’s right to defend itself against Islamist attempts to annihilate Jews 

 

This is a serious appeal to Jews living in London or within travelling distance of London.

If you do not attend this demonstration then you are prepared to see Israel wiped off the map.

If you do not attend this demonstration then you are prepared to see Jews removed from the world.

Vile anti-Semitism is being preached in mosques across the world and almost certainly the one in your neighbourhood.

Are you going to honour those who have lost their lives for the Jewish people?

Are you going to demur to being called “apes and pigs” instead of the people you are?

Or are you going to dishonour those who made the ultimate sacrifice to provide the Jewish people with a HOMELAND and thereby dishonour yourselves?

Non-Jews are demonstrating on 13th December against the anti-Semitism being taught in mosques which goes unchallenged by politicians, the media and so-called ‘moderate’ Muslims.

Jews cannot, in all conscience, leave it to non-Jews to protest on the behalf of Jews who are once again the world’s whipping boy.

If Islam takes over Europe and the West where will Jews run to?  Support your friends now!

Calling Jews, especially ex-IDF who are concerned about the rise in anti-Semitic attacks in Europe particularly by Muslims and the flagrant anti-Israel bias in the Western media

Please come to the demonstration on 13^th December in Harrow to protest against further mosque building until hatred is finally stopped being preached in existing mosques and to stop the Islamisation of Europe

BRING ONE THOUSAND ISRAELI FLAGS – There are 295,000 Jews in the UK so surely 1,000 can give 2 hours on a Sunday and bring a flag each!

Here are some reasons why Jews must come to this demonstration

Anti-Semitic attacks have increased alarmingly in Europe especially by the hands of Muslims and Robert Spencer, eloquently as always, explains why . Of course the media would have it that Israel and the bombing of Gaza are the reasons.

France has seen the most noticeable increase in anti-Semitic attacks by Muslims which has caused an exodus of Jews from France.  Indeed it was suggested that emigration of Jews to Israel was the best answer to anti-Semitism in France.

Around 850,000 Jews have been ousted from Arab countries (no sanctions for genocide though) and reportedly one Jew is left in Afghanistan

So where are Jews to go?

Arguably, (some say undoubtedly) the media enflame the situation.

The anti-Israel bias is barely disguised.  Recently Peter Oborne reported on Channel4’s ‘Dispatches’ about the strength of the Israeli lobby in the press and government in the UK http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/4od suggesting that it was far too strong and the media were afraid.

The trouble with this programme is that it never even attempted to find a cause and effect. Rather like we are led to believe that everything was peaceful and calm before the first Crusade, we are led to believe that reports about Israel were always impartial and the Israeli lobby happened for no reason. Jews know that was far from the case.

The Palestine v Israel conflict has never been reported impartially. Indeed downright lies have been broadcast deliberately to put Israel in a bad light.

For example, the alleged shooting of the 12 year-old Mohammed Al-Dura whilst sheltering behind his father was exposed as fake in a French court.

This is just one video of several showing the untruth.

Similarly, videos of children being “rescued” from bombed buildings were reportedly faked. We know about  doctored photos.

Often the internet is the only recourse to reverse the chicanery of the Taqiyya TV companies, but even there such sites as Honest Reporting are targetted by TV channels.

The largest United Nations voting bloc is comprised of the 57 Muslim countries which have tried to isolate Israel several times, most notably in the two Durban Conferences .

However, at least somebody speaks up for Israel in the United Nations, refreshingly.

Thanks to UN Watch

So please come to the Harrow demonstration to support those who support Jews, Israel and the truth.