European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2007 on combating the rise of

The EU has the naïve thought that by writing this resolution the islam can be forced to get rid of every  fundamentalistic idea it has. Unfortunatly this will never happen because islam is by nature fundamentalistic. The only thing that’s likely going to happen is that SIOE and SIAD are regarded xenophobic and intolerant organizations and therefore punishable by law. The sharpness of both SIAD and SIOE will be killed.

SIOE (and SIAD) will uphold the constitutional laws of their country, but we can not agree to go along with this latest EU resolution. We will not accept nor will we acknowledge this resolution. We can’t, because we are on a mission. The mission to protect freedom and democracy against the alien threat of islam and we will continue to do so even when it means going underground.

There were some democratic politicians in the parliament on the day of betrayal. See here what the MSM don’t dare to show you:

Read the EU resolution and our comments:

 (SIOE’s comments in italics)

The European Parliament ,

–   having regard to its previous resolutions on racism, xenophobia and
extremism, particularly that of 20 February 1997 on racism, xenophobia and
the extreme right(1) , that of 15 June 2006 on the increase in racist and
homophobic violence in Europe(2) and its position of 29 November 2007 on the
proposal for a Council Framework Decision on combating certain forms and
expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law(3) ,

–   having regard to its resolution of 27 January 2005 on the Holocaust, anti-
Semitism and racism(4) ,

–   having regard to Articles 6, 7 and 29 of the EU Treaty and Article 13 of
the EC Treaty, which commit the EU and its Member States to upholding human
rights and fundamental freedoms and which provide it with the means to fight
racism, xenophobia and discrimination, to the Charter of Fundamental Rights
of the European Union (the Charter of Fundamental Rights) and to the Council
Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 of 15 February 2007 establishing the European
Union Fundamental Rights Agency(5) (the Fundamental Rights Agency),

–   having regard to the international human rights instruments which
prohibit discrimination based on racial and ethnic origin, notably the
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), both signed by all the Member States and a
large number of other States,

–   having regard to European Union activities to fight racism, xenophobia,
anti-Semitism and homophobia, in particular the two anti-discrimination
directives (Directive 2000/43/EC implementing the principle of equal
treatment of persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin(6) and Directive
2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment
and occupation(7) ), as well as to the above-mentioned Framework Decision on
combating racism and xenophobia,

–   having regard to Resolution 1344 of 29 September 2003 of the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the threat posed to
democracy by extremist parties and movements in Europe,

–   having regard to the Report on Racism and Xenophobia in the Member States
of the EU published in 2007 by the Fundamental Rights Agency,

–   having regard to the report by the Organization for Security and Co-
operation in Europe (OSCE) entitled ‘Challenges and Responses to Hate-
Motivated Incidents in the OSCE Region’ of October 2006,

–   having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure,
A.   seriously concerned at the resurgence in Europe of extremist movements
and paramilitary groups and parties, some of which even have governmental
responsibilities, which base their ideology, political discourse, practices
and conduct on discrimination, including racism, intolerance, incitement to
religious hatred, exclusion, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-Gypsyism,
homophobia, misogyny and ultra-nationalism, and whereas several European
countries have recently experienced hatred, violent events and killings,

Apart from the fact that most of the used keywords are directly linked to islam, there are also a few keywords which are important for SIOE. These keywords are: Intolerance, Exclusion and Xenophobia. Because of the very nature of islam, SIOE has to regard islam as a dangerous and violent political force, completely alien to our western values and a threat to our freedom and democracy. Therefore SIOE is intolerant towards islam and we want to exclude any influence from islam to our western values and democracy. We could and we will be called Xenophobic because of this main point.
Unfortunately the EU doesn’t regard islam as a political threat to Europe, so by power of the keywords SIOE is about to be endangered in her present existence.

B.   seriously alarmed at the Islamic fundamentalist recruitment and violent
propaganda campaign with terrorist attacks within the European Union, based
on the hatred of European values and anti-semitism,

Of course SIOE also is alarmed about the islamistic fundamental recruitments, except we know this hatred is not based of the European values and anti-semitism. This hatred is entirely based on the quran, the soenas and the hadith. This hate is widely spread throughout Europe during the sermons in the European mosques and during lessons in jihad in islamitic schools  The difference here is that the EU regards the Islamic fundamental actions as a result of hate against our western values while SIOE regards these actions as a result of islam and her goals. The EU is not in a position to call hatred upon themselves. It’s islam itself who is ordered through the quran, the soenas and the hadith to fight, hate and even kill everything what’s alien to them.
But in the near future SIOE cannot say those things anymore because of the keywords used in pt. “A”.

C.   whereas these extremist ideologies are incompatible with the principles
of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and
the rule of law as set out in Article 6 of the EU Treaty, which reflect the
values of diversity and equality on which the European Union is based,

Again the EU makes a split between Islamic extremist ideologies and islam.
SIOE has the opinion that every follower of islam is an extremist by nature because each and every one of them is forced to live up to the rules in the quran and are expected to follow the soena and the hadith. If they don’t, they are not regarded genuine muslims  

D.   whereas no Member State is immune from the intrinsic threats that
extremism poses to democracy and, therefore combating the spread of
xenophobic attitudes and extremist political movements is a European
challenge that requires a joint and coordinated approach,

Speaks about combating Xenophobic attitudes and extremist political movements. So not only SIOE is threatened in her existence but also SIAD is. It’s almost 100 % sure that every political party or every other movement which are criticise islam to the max will soon be outlawed.

E.   whereas some political parties and movements, including those currently
in power in a number of countries or represented at local, national or
European level, have deliberately placed intolerance and/or violence based on
race, ethnic origin, nationality, religion and sexual orientation at the
heart of their agenda,

Same as pt “D”

F.   whereas neo-Nazi, paramilitary and other extremisms are directing their
violent attacks against a wide variety of vulnerable population groups,
including migrants, the Roma, homosexuals, anti-racist activists and the
homeless,

To bad that “other extremisms” is used together with “neo-nazies” and that “migrants” en “anti-racists activists” are mentioned together with “other vulnaral population groups”. It’s most likely that SIOE as well as SIAD will be called extremists organizations because we answer exactly to the definition the EU established. That doesn’t mean we are in the wrong. On the contrary, we will always fight for our freedom and independence, against political correctness and the influence of islam to our western values and we will keep on doing so. Unfortunately one of the powers which has to be fought are the anti-racists movements, also knows as AFA. According to this resolution they are now, or soon will be, protected by European law.

G.   whereas the existence of public and easily accessible websites which
incite to hatred raises serious concerns as to how to counteract the problem
without violating freedom of expression,

Even websites can be closed down. So much for freedom of speech

1.  Strongly condemns all racist and hate attacks, and calls on all
authorities to do everything in their power to punish those responsible;
expresses its solidarity with all victims of such attacks and their families;

2.  Points out that fighting extremism must not have any negative effects on
the permanent obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal
principles, including freedom of expression and association, as enshrined in
Article 6 of the EU Treaty;

3.  Deplores the fact that some mainstream parties have seen fit to give
credibility and acceptance to extremist parties by entering into coalition
agreements, thereby sacrificing their moral integrity for the sake of short-
term political gain and expediency;

4.  Notes that the increasing number of extremist organisations, which often
contain neo-fascist elements, can exacerbate fears in society that can lead
to manifestations of racism in a broad range of areas, including employment,
housing, education, health, policing, access to goods and services and the
media;

5.  Urges the Commission and Council to lead the search for appropriate
political and legal responses, especially at the preventive stage with
reference to young people’s education and public information, teaching
against totalitarianism and disseminating the principles of human rights and
fundamental freedoms in order to keep alive the memory of European history;
calls upon the Member States to develop policies of education for democratic
citizenship based on citizens’ rights and responsibilities;

6.  Urges the Commission to monitor the full application of the existing
legislation designed to prohibit incitement to political and religious
violence, racism and xenophobia; calls on Member States to monitor the strict
implementation and constant improvement of anti-racist laws, information and
awareness-raising campaigns in the media and educational establishments;

Again the word “Xenopfobia” is used but now in combination with legislation.
The EU also calls on member states to implement new laws to prevent xenophobia among others

7.  Urges all democratic political forces, regardless of ideology, to avoid
any support for extremist parties of a racist or xenophobic character,
whether explicit or implicit, and hence also any alliance whatsoever with
their elected representatives;

It’s very clear that the EU wants to isolate islam critic groups, movements or political parties. Only the EU substitutes islam criticism with xenophobia which is going to considered as an illegal and unlawful act and therefore punishable.

8.  Warns, looking ahead to the 2009 European elections, of the possibility
that extremist parties may secure representation in the European Parliament
and calls on the political groups to take the appropriate measures in order
to ensure that a democratic institution is not used as a platform for
financing and echoing anti-democratic messages;

In the very near future it’s going to be impossible to get into the EU parliament because your political party might be called xenophobic. So except the fact that such a party will be isolated, it’s also breaking several EU and national laws simply because of its existence and therefore punishable

9.  Calls on the EU institutions to give a clear mandate to the Fundamental
Rights Agency to investigate the structures of extremist groups in order to
assess whether some of them coordinate their work within their groups across
the European Union or at regional level;

This will be the start of a wide spread witch hunt because under this resolution every kind of criticism is regarded as xenophobic. So groups like SIOE and SIAD will get infiltrated. It’s just a matter of time 

10.  Reiterates its belief that public personalities should refrain from
statements that encourage or incite to hatred or stigmatisation of groups of
people on the basis of their race, ethnic origin, religion, disability,
sexual orientation or nationality; believes that if public personalities
incite to hatred, the fact that they have a high public profile should be
considered an aggravating circumstance; condemns, in particular, the worrying
prevalence of anti-semitism;

Speaks for itself. It’s just repeated what’s already been said.

11.  Calls on the media to inform the public about the dangers of hate speech
and to help promote the principles and values of democracy, equality and
tolerance;

Well the media again is used for “informing the people” of the EU principles, etc. One also can use the term: Mind control or Brainwashing

12.  Requests all Member States to at least provide for the possibility -
after a court ruling - of withdrawing public funding from political parties
that do not condemn violence and terrorism and do not respect human rights
and fundamental freedoms, democracy and the rule of law as set out in the
ECHR and the Charter of Fundamental Rights; and calls on those that already
have this possibility to do so without delay; also calls on the Commission to
ensure that no EU funding is available to media which are used as a platform
to widely promote racist, xenophobic and homophobic ideas;

Speaks for it self

13.  Calls on the Commission to support NGOs and civil society organisations
devoted to promoting democratic values, human dignity, solidarity, social
inclusion, inter-cultural dialogue and social awareness of the dangers of
radicalisation and violent extremism, and which are devoted to fighting all
forms of discrimination;

Speaks for it self

14.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the
Commission, the governments of the Member States and the Council of Europe.
 

The EU has the naïve thought that by writing this resolution the islam can be forced to get rid of every  fundamentalistic idea it has. Unfortunately this will never happen because islam is by nature fundamentalistic. The only thing that’s likely going to happen is that SIOE and SIAD are regarded xenophobic and intolerant organizations and therefore punishable by law. The sharpness of both SIAD and SIOE will be killed. SIOE (and SIAD) will uphold the constitutional laws of their country but we can not agree to go along with this latest EU resolution. We will not accept nor will we acknowledge this resolution. We can’t, because we are on a mission. The mission to protect freedom and democracy against the alien threat of islam and we will continue to do so even when it means going underground.

Finally the proof that there never will be moderated or liberal islam:

“There are no, neither will be, any liberal muslims. When there are muslims hoping for liberal islam, they can forget it. Liberal islam goes against the will of allah”

Fatwah for the whole Islamic world by sheik Saleh al- Fozan on July 2007