Excerpt from the Barcelona – Euro Mediterranean Declaration of 1995
Posted by Sitemaster on June 14, 2009
Excerpt from the Barcelona – Euro Mediterranean Declaration of 1995: http://euro-med.dk/conference
The Euro Mediterranean Declaration was agreed upon by the EU, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel and comprises:
Comprehensive political partnership, among other things about:
1.Establishing a free trade area and economic integration to begin by the year of 2010
2.Considerably more money for the partners
3.Cultural partnership.
The EU Offers the Populations of 9 Muslim Countries Free Movement of Goods, Services, Capital and People into the EU.
In return for concrete political and economic changes the EU offers partners´integration into the expanded internal market of the EU and the possibility to obtain free movement for goods, services, money and people.
Association agreements have been made with all partner countries except Syria – which will be offered association in 2009. (Abstract of the 6. Euromediterranean Foreign Minnister Conference in Naples 2-3 Dec. 2003). http://euro-med.dk/partnership
Confirmed by the Danish Prime Minister on Aug. 28, 2006 in a correspondence where on Sept. 12, 2006 he refused to tell why he, the government and media have concealed the Euromediterranean Project for 11 (now 13) years http://xrl.us/beb3d2 On Jan. 7, 2009 he refused once more.
Negotiations about Turkish EU entrance began in 2005.
The Union for the Mediterranean to extend the Mediterranean Project from 14 July 2008 “So far, only the ancient Romans achieved this: The Union for the Mediterranean is created.” Nicolas Sarkozy: “We will make the Mediterranean basin an area of peace and will build it up as we have built up the European Union” (ANSAMED 14 July 2008 http://tinyurl.com/8×6zn9).
43 leaders from Europe and the Mediterranean countries met (in Paris) with UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and EU Commission President Manuel Barroso. In addition, representatives of the World Bank and the European Investment Bank, the Arab League, the Islamic Conference Organization and the Maghreb Union were present – a forum at the highest level. (Der Spiegel Online 14.juli 2008 http://tinyurl.com/88g3n6.
2002, Louis Michel, then Belgian Foreign Minister and current member of the European Commission: “The EU will cover the whole Mediterranean region including North Africa and the Middle East.” (Brussels Journal 27 March 2007 http://tinyurl.com/85rj23).
Morocco on the way into the EU
”At the seventh meeting of the EU-Morocco Association Council, the EU has approved a package of measures to strengthen the partnership with Morocco on political and security issues, a comprehensive and deeper free trade agreement, the gradual integration of Morocco into a number of EU sectorial policies and the development of people-to-people exchanges ” (EU Press Release 13 Oct. 2008 http://tinyurl.com/a8qfmf).
’Cultural policy must avoid the popular distinction between ‘them’ and ‘us’, even mentioning ‘the other’ , as this opens the gate for imposing collective identity on the individual’. Traugott Schoefthaler, former head of the Anna Lindh Foundation, a Euro Mediterranean propaganda apparatus). See Dialogue to Hospitality (pdf). http://euro-med.dk/objectives
The Danish Foreign Ministry is educating us from our ’stereotypes and prejudices’ towards Islamic culture – and so reflects the program of the Euromediterranean propaganda apparatus: the Anna Lindh Foundation, founded by the Arab League, the EU, the European Council, and the UNESCO:
’We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily ‘news journalism’ to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination – and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypic images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media, and advertising.
And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.
And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials.
We will arrange giant Muslim Youth Festivals – like the ‘Images of The Middle East’, which lasted 6 weeks in 2006 in Denmark. (Also read the Speech by the head, Olaf Gerlach Hansen, of the ‘Danish Center for Culture and Development’ (CCD) – run by the Danish Foreign Ministry – on the 13.05.2005 in Rabat http://tinyurl.com/23uxmg
In a correspondence, the Danish Prime Minister on Sept. 12, 2006 refused to inform why his government gives in to the above educational policy initiated by the Arab League and the EU.
The EU and the Danish governmental CCD have signed a cooperation agreement with the Islamic Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization, whose goal acc. to art. 5a of the ISESCO-Charter is to spread Muslim thinking and life style throughout the world.
The Euromediterranean is a step toward world government The Financial Times 8 December 2008: World Government is coming http://xrl.us/bebvqj
When trans-continental democracies and cooperative assemblies are possible global democratic order is just around the corner. (NEW EUROPE: A Completely New Agenda For Europe’s Center-Left, 2004-2009, p. 12-13, http://euro-med.dk/dagsorden).
Global democracy means the United Nations´ World Parliament http://xrl.us/bebvqq.
Billede Zealous Muslim immigrants flocking to Denmark and received warmly by the government
The European Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia – adopted by the European Parliament in November 2008
The following intentional conduct is punishable in all EU Member States: – Public incitement to violence or hatred, even by dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material aimed at any group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, color, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin. Public defense of denial or gross trivializing of the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined in the Statute of the International Criminal Court of Nuremberg (Articles 6, 7 and 8). Such conduct is punishable under the Penal Code with a minimum of 1-3 years imprisonment. http://euromed.dk/framework .
The European Arrest Warrant
now allows the extradition of e.g. Danish nationals to any EU country that may require it – even for offenses that are virtually no crime in Denmark – but, for example, in Germany, which can mean a difference between a 60-days suspended jail sentence in Denmark and 5 years’ of unsuspended imprisonment in Germany for the sale of Nazi music (Berlingske Tidende 22 December 2008). http://tinyurl.com/6u7cho
Newspapers, radio and television are controlled from above and keep silent on the Euromediterranean Project/Union for the Mediterranean
‘The Freedom of expression is central to the values and traditions of Europe. But its preservation depends on responsible behaviours by individuals.
By extension, we do not believe the media should be regulated from outside, but rather that you find ways to regulate yourselves.
In considering the question of self-regulation, I would also ask you to think about the need for monitoring from within your own professional bodies. I am convinced that will have a significant impact.
‘ (Benita Ferrero Waldner, EU-Commissioner for External Relations and the European Neighbourhood Policy to selected media representatives from the Euromediterranean zone in Vienna on May 22, 2006). http://xrl.us/bea5mi
Here is a firework display of suggestions to stifle the freedom of speech in the EU http://xrl.us/bemsgb.
European journalists are intimidated at the meddling of politics and business with their editorial guide lines – even threatening them imprisonment
Published by The Association Dansk Kultur in protection of the Danish Constitution of 1953.
Anglo Saxon said
All we can hope is that the amount of anti-immigrant parties that won seats in the EU elections can oppose the Eu-Med project from going ahead, I hope so if not this will be a very dark day for the whole of Europe. I can see Europe plunging back to the dark ages if it becomes Islamic, All they do is read the quran, schooling is nothing more than learning the quran, the amount of universities in Muslim countries is shocking,Ii think Israel has more universities than the rest of the countries in the middle east or at least more per head, Israel is very much a technology country, Iran modifies its technology from Russia and China doesn’t make it its own technology
So far only a few countries remain,that don’t have problems with Muslims, New Zealand and most of Central, South America and Iceland due to the numbers of muslims being very low.
If this EU-Med project goes ahead, we should starting saving up now, in case it gets really bad for us and we have the option to leave.
It seems again that the rich will be able to locate anytine they want but those who work will have a hard time.
Looks like there will be refugees fleeing muslim persecution from Europe soon, Could South America be our last refuge for Europeans.
The future doesn’t look good, here in the U.k. their passing an equality bill to make the BNP illegal cause their scared of the BNP success at the EU elections. the liberal lefties just can’t stand not being in power and will do anything to remove the threat of removing them from power
anonymous said
“We will make the Mediterranean basin an area of peace and will build it up as we have built up the European Union”
LOL
EUROPEAN UNION IS SH*T!
Look this video said
anonymous said
Feminists attack Obama over Islamic veil
Saturday, 06 June 2009
French feminists attacked US President Barack Obama’s defence of the Islamic veil yesterday, accusing him of dealing a blow to the rights of millions of women in order to appease religious sentiment.
Obama was due to arrive in Paris later in the day, after a Middle East tour in which he gave a speech in which he accused countries like France of hiding “hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism.”
France bans girls and young women from wearing Muslim headscarves in state schools, and women’s rights campaigners here see its widespread and sometimes compulsory use in the Islamic world as an abuse of women’s rights.
One French women’s rights group, Ni Putes Ni Soumises (“Neither whores, nor submissives”), said: “Reducing the dialogue between civilisations to a dialogue between religions is once again to instrumentalise women.
“By attacking secularism and defending the veil, the President of the United States [...] has hurt the struggle of millions of women, some of whom pay with their lives every day to escape fundamentalist violence,” it said.
Anne Saugier, president of the International Women’s Rights League that was founded by Simone de Beauvoir, accused Obama of seeking to reconcile the United States with Muslims “on the backs of women.”
“What a slap in the face for those women in Algeria, Iran and Afghanistan who died in atrocious conditions for having refused to wear what they consider the most radical sign of their oppression and segregation,” she said.
Wearing some variety of headdress – whether a scarf over the hair, a veil or face mask or a full length “burqua” – is compulsory in some Muslim majority countries and common among Muslim communities in others.
It is considered by some a sign of women’s subjugation and repression, and banned in some public institutions in some countries, but in his speech in Cairo on Thursday, Obama went out of his way to defend it on three occasions.
“It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear,” he said.
http://www.macaudailytimesnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28469&Itemid=33
anonymous said
incompetent Brown, chief of a fraudster governmemt is expected to be president of european union. shameless brown!
EUROPEAN UNION IS SH!T
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/107807/-Brown-could-be-EU-s-first-president-
«GORDON Brown is in line to become the EU’s first president, it emerged last night.»
anonymous said
«The job will become available later this year once the Lisbon Treaty is approved – and Mr Brown is now a front-runner according to EU diplomats.»
BASTARDS!
Dina said
An applause to those in Europe who see it coming!! As for muslim president Hussein Obama, he is already showing his true colors, anyone surprised?? Soon, if more people don’t wake up in Europe,someone will write a book titled: “The late great christian continent of Europe”. Why do europeans vote the leftists?? God help you!!
anonymous said
mega mosque, no thanks.
http://www.megamosquenothanks.com/
islamisation of Britain, churches converted into mosques.
http://www.libertiesalliance.org/?p=1479
anonymous said
dangerous authoritarian tendencies within the EU
The Lives of … All of Us
You know what they say about restaurants: there is no such thing as just one rat in the kitchen. It is the same here in Brussels. This week the Irish have finally seen the draft of assurances Brian Cowen’s government want from the other EU members before they make the Irish vote again on the Lisbon Treaty. The draft is a rat, but I’l deal with it later, after I’ve seen what is going to happen to the ‘assurances’ tomorrow and Friday at the European Council. Today I will deal with one of the other rats in Brussels, the Stockholm Programme.
It is unlikely you have ever heard of the Stockholm Programme. It has only just been published. However, a committee known as the Future Group, organised by the justice commission, started planning it in January 2007. The full name of the Future Group is ‘the Informal High Level Advisory Group of the Future of European Home Affairs Policy.’ The British had no representative on it, merely an ‘observer.’
The group’s findings have been bundled up as the Stockholm Programme. Here is how it works. The Lisbon Treaty gives new legal powers to the European institutions over, among other things, cross-border police co-operation, counter-terrorism, immigration, asylum and border controls. The Stockholm Programme outlines how the justice commission will implement these new legal powers for the next five years.
The commission claims the programme covers policy on ‘freedom, security and justice serving the citizen.’ Look closer and you will see it actually covers policy for restrictions on the citizen, surveillance by the European state — yes, your fingerprints, credit card charges, email traffic and health records are now going to be available from Galway to Bucharest — and the destruction of British judicial independence by the European institutions. Stockholm is a rat, and a big one.
If you don’t want to take it from a right-wing libertarian like me, you can take it from a whole pack of left-wing libertarians, the European Civil Liberties Network. The ECLN is made up of groups drawn from across Europe. One of the founders was Gareth Peirce, solicitor for the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six, and more lately for one of the prisoners at Guantanamo. Here is what the ECLN have to say about the Stockholm Programme: the policies outlined in Stockholm ‘constitute an attack on civil liberties and human rights.’ The warn against ‘dangerous authoritarian tendencies within the EU.’
They are right to do so. Under EU legislation, state agencies are already implementing comprehensive surveillance regimes and beginning to build up what the ECLN calls a ‘previously unimaginably detailed profile of the private and political lives of their citizens.’ This is often done in the absence of any data protection standards, judicial or democratic controls.
‘The EU has gone much further than the USA in terms of the legislation it has adopted to place its citizens under surveillance. While the Patriot Act has achieved notoriety, the EU has quietly adopted legislation on the mandatory fingerprinting of all EU passport, visa and residence permit-holders and the mandatory retention — for general law enforcement purposes — of all telecommunications data (our telephone, e-mail and internet usage records).’
The Future Group and their Stockholm Programme say they foresee a ‘digital tsunami’ that will revolutionise law enforcement. Add this to the fact that, as the ECLN says, ‘EU data protection law has already been left behind, with surveillance all but exempted. Individual rights to privacy and freedoms are being fatally undermined.’
One of the most rat-like things about these new proposals is the plan to set up a ‘Homeland Security’ industry. Billions of euros may be given as subsidies to European corporations to help them compete with US industries in developing security equipment and technology. If you knew how many thousands of uncontrolled, unregistered corporate lobbyists there are in Brussels, you would recognise the hand of European technology corporations in the drafting of this programme. Brussels will give the military-industrial corporations billions in European taxpayers’ money, and in return the corporations will deliver technology that helps all the new European security forces track every one of us..
What is coming out of this will undoubtedly be an EU identity card and population register. Even Dick Cheney didn’t dare try that one. There will be the power of security forces (forget ‘cops,’ what you are going to be hearing more and more about are ‘security forces’) to search computer hard-drives. But the security forces won’t be coming through your door with a warrant. The searches will be ‘remote,’ online. This will be a particular threat to lawyers, journalists and any politicians opposing these growing EU powers. The policy of remote hard-drive searches was first proposed for the EU by the German government in June 2008. Yes, the German government want a euro-Stasi. It really is so satisfying when politicians live up to their national stereotype.
Statewatch, another organisation monitoring civil liberties in Europe, is also warning against the Stockholm Programme. In an analysis of the Future Group’s report by Tony Bunyan, he writes: ‘European government and EU policy-makers are pursuing unfettered powers to access and gather masses of personal data on the everyday life of everyone — on the grounds that we can all be safe and secure from perceived “threats.”‘
‘There is an assumption, on this and wider issues in the U, that “if it is technologically possible, why should it not be introduced?”‘
He notes that the EU’s Schengen Information System (SIS) is to be upgraded to hold more categories of data (including fingerprints and DNA), access to all the data is tobe extended to all agencies (police, immigration and customs).’ The commission has proposed a system to track the names of all passengers in and out of the EU, but some governments ‘do not like limiting the use of data to terrorism and organsied crime and want to extend the proposals’ scope from just in and out of the EU to travel between EU states and even within each state.’ They want to extend it to sea travel and car travel, too: all those specialised cameras developed for reading car registration plates make it possible.
Ah, but ordinary people will be told that if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear. Ordinary people who believe that will then never realise, as Mr Bunyan says, ‘why they did not get a job interview because their employer had access to a criminal record based on a “spent” conviction or why their application for an insurance policy failed because the company had access to their health record.’
The final agreement on all this is due to be adopted by heads of state and government at a meeting in Stockholm in December. Between now and then there is nothing any of us can do to stop it — except force David Cameron to give Britain a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, no matter how many other countries have already ratified the treaty. Remember, the legal powers to establish this new techno-surveillance are only delivered to Brussels by the Lisbon Treaty. So demand a referendum, then vote No: or your secret ballot on Lisbon may be the last secret left to you.
http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2009/06/the-lives-of-all-of-us.html
Infidela said
Geert Wilders says that it’s 5 minutes to midnight. But I would say that it is 30 seconds to midnight. Midnight being January 2010, when the Euro-meditteraneans project kicks in, and muslims from 9 muslim countries can live and work in the EU.
If you equate 1 minute to 1 year, then in 6 months time when the Euro-meditteranean project begins is equivalent to 30 seconds.
anonymous said
Mediterranean Union was planned on our backs. European Union =backstabbers!
iwan7 said
thanks for sharing friend , stop dreaming start action