SIOE Nederland is back in wordpress

Here is the complaint SIOE Nederland sent to WordPress. Furthermore, a lot of people flooded wordpress with mails of the injustice and it helped. WordPress realised their mistake and brought SIOE Nederland back on the scene. Well done SIOE Nederland! And a big thanks to all the supportive people!

“Hi Toni,

Let me begin with the fact that we really regret the fact that wordpress has taken our site down. We never expected wordpress would fall for a trap like the abuse report you received.

SIOE Nederland is a peoplesmovement which is strongly against any form of rascism. We don’t have any ties with any polical party and we are against any totalitarian form of government. We are a movement that is fighthing the covered and uncovered islam expansion in the Netherlands. Our freedom of speech is at stake here so is our freedom of expression. Even the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh has been murdered and used as a pincushen with the approval of an imam. We are fighting within the boundries of Dutch Law.
Our supporters, some of them you probably know by now, are very angry and disapointed because what you have done.

There are some powers in Holland who don’t like the freedom of speech, these people are muslims, because we want to unmask them and reveal their hidden agenda and the leftwinged foundations. The mail you received with the so called complaint comes from an organization which has got nothing to do with politics.

You as an American must know what the 1st amendment means to you. In Holland and in Europe we have the so called freedom of speech. But this freedom goes as far as the political incorrect wants it to go. The suspension of our site is a good example.There are no, never will be any rascists articles on our site. A big part of our supporters are coloured for crying out loud!

SIOE Nederland is a movement that’s proud of our muliculturalism, we are proud that everybody can be who ever he or she wants to be. We are proud that everybody, Native Dutch, immigrants, homosexuals, you name it can live free in Holland. There is just one idiology, called islam, who beat up homosexuals, calling our women whores for not wearing a headscarf and who are chasing away the Jews from Amsterdam. We, the people will not accept this. Holland is radicalising very fast and politics is doing nothing about it. That’s why SIOE Nederland is founded. We are an organization by- and for the common people.

You are misled by this complain. We regret the fact that you even didn’t bother to contact us to ask what we are about. You just shutted us down. You didn’t do any research regarding the content of our site. You just took the complaint for granted without knowing what’s really going on in Holland and the rest of Europe for that matter.
Our articles contains no rascists remarks, we are strongly against rascism. We are for the freedom of speech and expression.

Extreme sites like stormfront can do what ever they want. Forums marokko can easily say that the Dutch had it comming to them that our soldiers are comming home in bodybags, they celibrate everytime this happens, and nobody is doing a thing about it.

SIOE Nederland favours a mulicultaral society, is against rascism and we are thrown of the server. Go figure.

We strongly urge you to correct your mistake and put our site back online. We didn’t do anything wrong. Suddenly not regarding the 1st amendment.

Best regards

Martin and Monique
Founders of SIOE Nederland”

WHEN THE REPUBLIC SELLS OFF ITS PRINCIPLES.

From SIOE France.

The French Republic is based on a set of principles and it can exist only in the respect for these. They are not the fruit of the fate but are the result of the fights for the democracy of the previous centuries. The history showed us that they were not definitively acquired and that they must be defended against all the totalitarianisms, as the fascism or the communism.

These republican principles created a pedestal on which our society is based. They assert that France is a laic and democratic republic; the national sovereign power belongs to the people consisted of equal citizens in rights: « the men are born and remain free and equal in rights » according to the first article of the “Declaration of rights of Men and citizen” [1789]. They are equal in right whatever their origin, their sex, their colour of skin or their religion. Our Republic put the principle of the equality between men and women. Among the republican principles, the freedom of expression, the freedom of thought, the political freedom are pillars.

But for several years, the Republic is confronted with the extension of a politico-religious ideology which expresses itself in the French landscape by the reproduction of mosques. At present a mosque is in construction in Marseille and it will go to join thousands of already present mosques on the ground of France. In front of this fast extension of the establishment of an ideology resulting from an outside world, the French citizens have the duty to ask the question: is the Islam respectful to republican principles ? To answer this question, it is necessary to compare our republican principles with the Islamic principles.

Does the Moslem ideology respect the equality between the men ? No. For the Islam, the Moslems are superior to the other men because holders of the most recent religion delivered by God, through the ” seal of the seers », Mahomet, this one passed on the verses of the Koran, the book revealed by very God and thus untouchable, unique and by whom the rules are to be literally followed. It is unthinkable for a Moslem whether he is the equal of a Jew or a Christian. It is moreover forbidden a Moslem of credit note of the Jewish or Christian friends: « Ô you who believe! Do not take for friends Jews and Chrétien; they are friends some of the others. » Sura V, verse 51.

Does the Moslem ideology advocate the equality between men and women? No. The Islam proclaims loud and clear the superiority of the men on the women, the Koran indicates: « the men have authority on the women » sura IV, verse 24. For the inheritances a man is worth two women in Islam: « God orders you to attribute to the boy a part equal to that of two girls. » Sura IV, verse 11 and still: « if he leaves brothers and sisters a part equal to that of two women returns to a man » sura IV verse 176.

Is the Moslem woman equally at the level of the marriage? No. The Islam advocates the polygamy: « marry, as you like, two, three or four women. » Sourate IV, verse 3.

Can a Moslem woman marry the man of her choice? No. She cannot marry a non-Moslem, it would be of the denial: because the husband has the superiority on his wife, for the Islam, she should thus follow the religion of her husband. If a Moslem marries a Christian, the foreseen penalty is the death. The forced marriages are current in land of Islam and a man can marry a new-year-old girl, like Mahomet who married Aïcha at the age of six and about whom the historic texts say that the marriage was consumed when she was nine years old.

Does the Moslem ideology respect the secularism? No. The word secularism does not exist in Koranic Arabic, the Islam is imperative in all the aspects of the life of the Moslem, at the level of its private life (even in its most intimate aspects), of its hygiene, its social life. The Koran settles the political life, the right, etc. In Islam, there is no separation between the religious domain and the political domain.

Does the Moslem ideology respect the freedom of expression? No. The cases of the caricatures of Mahomet, those of Rober Redeker and Salman Rushdie are the proof.
Does the Islamic ideology respect the freedom of thought and the freedom of religion? No. The denial is liable to the capital punishment. The Christians are regularly persecuted in land of Islam, as for example the Copts of Egypt. Let us remind the Armenian genocide Christians by the Moslem Turkish in 1915.

The list is not exhaustive, we could approach the other subjects as the slavery which is not forbidden by the Islam and which exists moreover always in certain Moslem countries, as the Islamic Republic of Maurinania. The stoning, the whipping, the amputation as the penalty are always current in land of Islam. All this thus prove clearly that the Islam is incompatible with our republican principles.

Nevertheless what has just been reminded above, France tolerates the unbearable by accepting its Islamization, our Islamization. Our town councillors, by pure electoral opportunism, multiply mosques. Now the Islam is incompatible with the democracy, the best proof is the report swamping that there is no democratic Moslem country to the world.

When Jean-Claude Gaudin gives the keys of the big mosque of Marseille to Nordine Cheikh, president of the association in charge of the project of this mosque, he contributes actively to the extension of an ideology which goes back up to the VIIth century and which did not evolve (as comparison, it’s as if France continued to be governed by the Merovingian laws).

A mosque is not the equivalent of a church, a simple place of cult, the role of the mosque was not expressed that by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan: « Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets ». The mosque has a political mission and the first one is to spread the Islam, it is a fortress intended to pursue the conquest of the territories which are not still Moslem, the Islam is imperialist and its purpose is to convert the whole humanity to the rules of the Koran. The political role of mosques is not to be any more demonstrated: it is from there that leave fatwas and Palestinian Intifadas, it is there that we found weapons and the recent current event showed us that the Islamist uprising in Pakistan had left the red mosque.

While certain foreigners settle down in France hoping to find a land of freedom, France does not defend any more its republican principles, it disposes of them in the name of the multiculturalism and of the right for the difference, lauded at all the levels of its society, it lets settle down and spread a politico-religious ideology which has never respected and does not respect still in the XXIth century the experiences of the democracy.

The French citizens have the duty to fight against the Islam to defend their liberties because the fight against the Islam is not a fight against a religion but a fight against the obscurantism and the totalitarianism.
Louis CHAGNON
November 25th, 2007

A look into the future?

The following text was sent to us by an Englishman concerned for the future of our continent. Denmark is used in the text as an example for dramatical reasons and not to offer exact information about Denmark. An example of how the future could play out for any European Country. 

It’s something for us to consider and debate.

Cross-posted from SIAD:

When movements like anti-Islamism start to grow, the authorities start monitoring their activities to see if they will develop into actually doing something other than talk. When real action starts the authorities then seek to assert some kind of control over the movement. SIOE has known for some time that certain national intelligence agencies have infiltrated some anti-Islamism blogs and websites with a view to gaining control. Such agencies say they want to bring anti-Islamists groups together for a common purpose, but the real intention is to centralise control.

They make money available to anti-Islamist organisations for meetings and other activities.

It has been made known to us however, that some webmasters and bloggers have been advised not to contact SIOE by other, supposedly, anti-Islamist bloggers.

This is because certain agencies are afraid of the Brussels march being the undoubted success it will be.

If any webmaster, blogger or other anti-Islamist has been advised not to contact SIOE, (especially if you have already been in previous contact with SIOE) then please tell SIOE. We will keep your information strictly confidential.

Brussels 9/11 is certain to be a great success and details are being finalised.

Proper organisation has ensured that the Brussels authorities will help us have a peaceful anti-Islamism demo.

---

Read more at SIAD

---

Why Terrorists Own Islam

Reader and commentator Stefcho has asked us to publish the following article:

---

Moderate Muslims are faced by a dilemma. One the one hand they consider themselves Muslims, but on the other they are faced with the Qur’an – the highest authority in Islam - which justifies intolerance towards other religions and war against non-believers. For example, Islamists often quote the following verse of the Qur’an:

God has purchased the persons and possessions of the believers in return for the Garden (Heaven) - they fight in Holy war: they kill and are killed - this is the true promise given by Him in the Torah, the Gospel, and the Qur’an.” Qur’an 9:111

Now moderates say that such verses are historic and no longer apply. But notice that they do not reject such verses outright. In fact, unlike Westerners, Islamists know very well that moderate Muslims cannot, and will not, be seen to reject or “cherry-pick” any part of the Qur’an. Why? Because the Qur’an is believed by all Muslims to be the direct, unmediated words dictated from Allah to Muhammad. The Qur’an, and the violent example of the Prophet Muhammad himself, leave moderate Muslims powerless to counter extremism. They are caught between a rock and a hard place. For example, a moderate Muslim might want to accept the notion that all religions should be treated equally. Unfortunately, they cannot because the Qur’an states that:

It is He (Allah) who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth, to show that it is above all other religions, however much the idolaters may hate this. Qur’an 9:38

And, if a Muslim rejects any part of the Qur’an then they open themselves to being condemned as non-believers. For, as the Qur’an states:

… those who desire to make a distinction between Allah and His Messenger and say: We believe in some and disbelieve in others, and desire to take a course between this and that. These are truly unbelievers, and we have prepared for the unbelievers a disgraceful chastisement. Qur’an 4:150

And if that is not clear enough…

… believe ye in part of the Scripture and disbelieve ye in a part thereof? And what is the reward of those who do so, save ignominy in the life of the world, and will be consigned to the most grievous doom in the next. Qur’an 2:85

For a Muslim, there is nothing worse than being a non-believer; for such people are consigned to hell for eternity. Furthermore, their own family is likely to reject them:

Believers, do not take your fathers and brothers as allies if they prefer disbelief to faith: those of you who do so are doing wrong. Qur’an 9:23

Hence, when Islamic terrorists quote freely from the Qur’an, the only solution for moderate Muslims is silence (or denying there is a problem). They cannot reject any of the violence, intolerant or barbaric verses of the Qur’an, since doing so opens them to claims of heresy. And this is why, where Islam is concerned, Islamists speak with the authority of the Qur’an, whilst moderates are consigned to nervously avoiding a plethora of verbal landmines they wish were not there.

My final point is this. Wherever there is Islam, there is the potential for intolerance and violence justified by religion. Even if, as in modern, there are more moderates than fanatics – the potential for using Islam to justify violence will always be present. Islam cannot compromise - which is why it should be banned.

---

This chap has certainly understood the problem. Banning Islam is, unfortunately, impossible. But it must be moderated to comply with modernity and our laws must not be changed merely to accomodate it. Getting Islam into the twenty first century will not be easy and will be opposed by those who cannot distance themselves from fundamentalist ideals. It is Islam that must change. Not the western world.
Our thanks to Stefcho for his input.